- How Much Longer Will We, a People, Accept a Fact That Our Government Ignores Us?
- How Can ADHD Affect Your Life?
- Ja’Mal Green Takes Top Spot on Mayoral Ballot
- Rick and Morty Prefinale Season 6 Review
- TNS, and My Endeavor Into It
- Actress Kirstie Alley Dies during Age 71
- The USPS Is a Hot Mess and Needs a Major Reformation
- Do It Now: There Is No Promise That Tomorrow Is a Reality
- Kanye West Seems to Have Lost His Mind
- Why World AIDS Day Is Important [Video]
Why aim cricket, asks Niranjan Shah
- Updated: January 2, 2017
Niranjan Shah
Rajkot:: With a Supreme Court approaching to come adult with their outcome in a Justice RM Lodha committee’s recommendations to a Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) box today, a Board’s many gifted active administrator, Niranjan Shah asked, “Why singular out cricket?”
“You can’t usually singular out cricket. You should make manners and regulations for any globe in life, not usually for cricket. Yes, we are a renouned body, though we are like other sporting associations as well,” Rajkot-based Shah told mid-day while examination a Mumbai vs Tamil Nadu Ranji Trophy semi-final yesterday. While home on Sharad Pawar’s new abdication as boss of a Mumbai Cricket Association, he said, “It might be his (Pawar) personal decision, though anyone can get undone with this form of atmosphere. We don’t know what tomorrow has in store for us. We (administrators) are all really frustrated. What wrong have we done, we don’t know.”
Shah (72), a conduct of a Saurashtra Cricket Association, felt a one state, one opinion and 70-year age top for administrators as endorsed by a Lodha Panel are vital concerns for a BCCI. “Again, because singular out cricket in a age restriction? What is a basement of this 70-year age cap? “And, what is this cooling off duration regulation? BCCI is already following a three-year tenure for a administrators,” he stressed.
The maestro director realised that it could be predestine for a likes of him soon. Whatever a Supreme Court rules, we will have to obey. We realize that a predestine is a hands of a Supreme Court,” he concluded.