Azhar is fighting insane as ‘match-fixer’ past comes behind to haunt him

Azharuddin's indignant and prepared to fight
Azharuddin’s indignant and prepared to fight   

Hyderabad: In a reversal to former Indian captain Mohammad Azharuddin, his assignment for a post of boss of a Hyderabad Cricket Association (HCA) was deserted by a returning officer on Saturday.

Returning officer K. Rajeev Reddy cited a anathema imposed on Azhar by a Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) for his purported impasse in match-fixing.

Azharuddin, however, pronounced a returning officer had not given reasons for rejecting his assignment and demanded a same in writing.

“I am disappointed. This is a contemptible state of affairs,” a 53-year-old said.

The former batsman skeleton to proceed a justice subsequent week to plea a returning officer’s action.

Azhar pronounced he can’t be prevented from contesting a HCA elections as a justice had struck down a anathema on him.

Azharuddin, who led India in 3 unbroken World Cups (1992, 1996, 1999), has been criminialized for life by a BCCI for his purported impasse in a match-fixing liaison that rocked Indian cricket in 2000.

After a prolonged authorised battle, Azharuddin perceived a enlightened sequence from a Andhra High Court in 2011, though the BCCI is nonetheless to strictly lift his ban.

When reminded that a BCCI had not strictly carried a anathema on him, Azhar pronounced a house did not plea a justice order.

A source in a HCA pronounced that Azharuddin’s application was deserted by returning officer K Rajiv Reddy who was not sure either a BCCI has carried a anathema on him for alleged match-fixing and either he is a HCA voter or not.

“His (Azharuddin’s) assignment paper was deserted by the returning officer on scrutiny. The returning officer wrote to the BCCI either his anathema for compare regulating has been carried or not. The BCCI did not reply,” a source in a HCA said.

Another source, however, pronounced that a returning officer should have created to a Lodha Committee instead of the BCCI.

There was also a emanate of either Azharuddin is enrolled as a HCA voter or not.

The former captain claimed that he had also given a illustration to a BCCI.

“I honour a BCCI though these are things over my control. we had a severe time, though we don’t wish to censure anyone,” he said.

Azhar pronounced his solitary goal in contesting a choosing was to apportion whatever he can to a graduation of a diversion though he was being prevented from doing this.

“You can’t conceal me,” he asserted and announced his skeleton to proceed a justice after a Sankranti holidays.

With Azhar’s assignment being rejected, former Member of Parliament G. Vivek and Vidyuth Jaisimha, son of late former cricketer M.L. Jaisimha, remained in a ravel for a president’s post in a elections scheduled to be reason on Jan 17.

Azhar wondered how Vivek’s assignment was not deserted as he is an confidant to a Telangana supervision and binds a arrange of a cupboard minister.

He forked out that as per a Supreme Court, a supervision worker can’t competition a elections.

Azhar was accompanied by former HCA boss Arshad Ayub and HCA secretary John Manoj. They took clever difference to a returning officer’s movement in dogmatic A. Seshnarayan as being inaugurated as a new secretary unopposed.

They purported that this amounted to disregard of justice as a Hyderabad High Court had destined that a formula should not be announced compartment Jan 18, when a box will come adult for final hearing.

Ayub, a former cricketer, had quit as HCA boss in a arise of a recommendations of a Supreme Court allocated Lodha committee.

The opposition organisation constituted an adhoc cabinet and approached a justice seeking directions to reason a elections.

The reduce justice final month destined HCA to reason a elections to a peak legislature on Jan 17 and allocated disciple K. Rajeev Reddy as commissioner for conducting a elections.

Some of a bureau bearers of HCA had approached a Hyderabad High Court on a belligerent that a choosing routine was not being conducted as per a recommendations of a Lodha cabinet and directions of a Supreme Court.

The High Court on Jan 11 refused to stay a elections. It, however, destined that a formula should not be announced compartment serve orders.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>